Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VINOD SHARMA versus U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD. SHAKTI BHAWAN & ORS.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Vinod Sharma v. U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Shakti Bhawan & Ors. - WRIT - C No. 14723 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 11298 (11 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble A. K. Yog, J.

Hon'ble V.C. Misra,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.  No one is present on behalf of the respondent Corporation to oppose the Writ Petition.

The grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of having  deposited Rs.87,052/-, as demanded by the respondent/ Corporation, against the outstanding dues prior to the disposal of the representation, so filed by the petitioner, and on its  assurance that electricity connection would be provided and thereafter gave the electricity connection also but subsequently disconnected the same and have demanded the balance amount from the petitioner to be paid to it and the representation of the petitioner has also not been disposed of yet.

Under the facts and circumstances of this case,  respondent No.2 is directed to decide the representation moved afresh by the petitioner within 12 weeks from the date of the receipt of the same, which the petitioner may file within three weeks from today along with certified copy of this order, provided the petitioner deposits further amount of Rs.50,000/- with Respondent No.2 within three weeks from today and in case the said amount is so deposited within time the respondent No.2 shall re-connect the electricity on the premises in question.

In default of the deposit of the said amount and non-filing of the representation within the above said stipulated time by the petitioner, this order shall stand vacated without further reference to the Court.

Writ Petition is disposed of finally subject to above directions/observations.

No order as to cost.

Dated: 11-7-2006

RPS


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.