High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Vinod Sharma v. U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Shakti Bhawan & Ors. - WRIT - C No. 14723 of 2006  RD-AH 11298 (11 July 2006)
Hon'ble A. K. Yog, J.
Hon'ble V.C. Misra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No one is present on behalf of the respondent Corporation to oppose the Writ Petition.
The grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of having deposited Rs.87,052/-, as demanded by the respondent/ Corporation, against the outstanding dues prior to the disposal of the representation, so filed by the petitioner, and on its assurance that electricity connection would be provided and thereafter gave the electricity connection also but subsequently disconnected the same and have demanded the balance amount from the petitioner to be paid to it and the representation of the petitioner has also not been disposed of yet.
Under the facts and circumstances of this case, respondent No.2 is directed to decide the representation moved afresh by the petitioner within 12 weeks from the date of the receipt of the same, which the petitioner may file within three weeks from today along with certified copy of this order, provided the petitioner deposits further amount of Rs.50,000/- with Respondent No.2 within three weeks from today and in case the said amount is so deposited within time the respondent No.2 shall re-connect the electricity on the premises in question.
In default of the deposit of the said amount and non-filing of the representation within the above said stipulated time by the petitioner, this order shall stand vacated without further reference to the Court.
Writ Petition is disposed of finally subject to above directions/observations.
No order as to cost.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.