Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VINOD versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Vinod v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9572 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 11299 (11 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Vinod involved in case Crime No. 284 of 2006 under section 8/20 NDPS Act, Police station Dhudhibari, district Maharajganj.

Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

Recovery of 5 Kg ganja is said to have been made from the possession of the applicant.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that quantity of ganja alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant is less than commercial quantity. The learned counsel submitted that the applicant has been enlarged on bail on 27.6.2006 for offences under section 379, 411 I.P.C.

The learned AGA argued that recovery of ganja more than small quantity was made from the possession of the applicant.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The recovery of 5 Kg. ganja is said to have been made from the possession of the applicant. The quantity of ganja seized is less than commercial quantity. There are no public witnesses to the recovery. There is criminal history of one case  of theft in which the applicant  is on bail. In view of these facts,  I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Vinod involved in case Crime No. 284 of 2006 under section 8/20 NDPS Act, Police station Dhudhibari, district Maharajganj, be released on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

D/-11.7.2006

Mahmood-9572-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.