High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Vinod v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9572 of 2006  RD-AH 11299 (11 July 2006)
Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.
This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Vinod involved in case Crime No. 284 of 2006 under section 8/20 NDPS Act, Police station Dhudhibari, district Maharajganj.
Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.
Recovery of 5 Kg ganja is said to have been made from the possession of the applicant.
The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that quantity of ganja alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant is less than commercial quantity. The learned counsel submitted that the applicant has been enlarged on bail on 27.6.2006 for offences under section 379, 411 I.P.C.
The learned AGA argued that recovery of ganja more than small quantity was made from the possession of the applicant.
I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.
The recovery of 5 Kg. ganja is said to have been made from the possession of the applicant. The quantity of ganja seized is less than commercial quantity. There are no public witnesses to the recovery. There is criminal history of one case of theft in which the applicant is on bail. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant Vinod involved in case Crime No. 284 of 2006 under section 8/20 NDPS Act, Police station Dhudhibari, district Maharajganj, be released on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.