Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

LALA RAM versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Lala Ram v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 10060 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 11327 (12 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 54

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 10060 OF 2006.

Lala Ram Vs. State of U.P.

Hon. Mrs. Poonam Srivastava, J.

Heard Sri Rajul Bhargava, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State which is taken on record.

According to the narration of the first information report, the applicant is alleged to be armed with licensee single barrel gun, Jasram with Katta and remaining accused are alleged to be armed with sharp edged weapon. On perusal of the post mortem report, there is single fire arm injury on the body of the deceased. Subsequently in the statements of the witnesses including the complainant, they have exonerated the co-accused Jasram son of Deepa who is alleged to be armed with Katta, and assigned specific role in the first information report. In paragraph 9 of the affidavit, criminal history of Manik Chandra and in paragraph 10 of the affidavit the criminal history of the deceased has been given which is admitted by the learned A.G.A. in the counter affidavit.

Taking into consideration the submissions made on behalf of the applicant, the bail application of the present applicant is allowed.

Let the applicant Lala Ram be released on bail in Case Crime No. 26 of 2006, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 I.P.C., Police Station Shergarh, District Mathura subject to his furnishing personal bond with two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, besides that the applicant shall also give an undertaking before the court concerned that he will not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses after he is released on bail and shall also co-operate in expeditious trial of the case by the trial court who shall decide the case expeditiously keeping in view the provisions of Section 309 Cr.P.C. in this connection. It will be open to the trial court to cancel his bail in case there is any lapse on the part of the applicant in this regard.

Dt. 12.7.2006.    

Rmk.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.