Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAMA VEER SINGH YADAV versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Rama Veer Singh Yadav v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 3306 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 11356 (12 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Ram Veer Singh Yadav   indicted in case crime No. 514  of 2005  under sections  18/20 of  N.D.P.S.  P.S. Milak  District Rampur .

Heard Shri Krishna Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The recovery of about  3 Kg. opium is said to have been made from the possession of the applicant.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the quantity of morphine in the sample of 100 gm opium was found as 1.6%. According to learned counsel quantity of morphine in the opium seized is less than commercial quantity. According to learned counsel compliance of provisions of section 50 of N.D.P.S. Act was not made by the searching official.

The learned A.G.A. submitted that recovery of opium more than commercial quantity has been made from possession of the applicant. According to the learned counsel there is criminal history of two cases of theft against the applicant.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

There are no public witnesses to the recovery. The quantity of opium seized has been shown as about 3 kg. The recovered quantity of opium has not been mentioned in the recovery memo after weighment. In the   sample of 100 gm opium sent to the forensic science  laboratory for analysis  1.6 % morphine has been found.  In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Ram Veer Singh Yadav   indicted in case crime No. 514  of 2005  under sections  18/20 of  N.D.P.S.  P.S. Milak  District Rampur be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/3306/06

12.7.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.