Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SWAMI PRAGYANAND KANYA COLLEGE versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Swami Pragyanand Kanya College v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 36040 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 11377 (12 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No.7

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 36040 of 2006

Committee of Management of proposed Swami Pragyanand Kanya Inter College Ngla Doon Vikas Khand Karhan Post Karhal District Mainpuri through its Manager Pragyanand Sarswati.                                                                      Petitioner

                                                       Versus

State of U.P. and others.                                                                 Respondents

Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari, J.

           Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

            This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding respondent no.1 not to ask for fresh resolution from respondent no.4 in respect of establishment of Kanya Vidyalaya at Karhal Mainpuri till the representation of the petitioner dated 28.4.2006 (Annexure-6) to the writ petition) is decided in pursuance of the order of this Court dated 1.3.2006 in Writ Petition No. 12746 of 2006, Committee of Management of proposed Swami Pragyanand Kanya Inter College Ngla Doon Vikas Khand Karhan Post Karhal District Mainpuri through its Manager Pragyanand Sarswati Vs. State of U.P. and others.

              The counsel for the petitioner states that the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 28.4.2006 has not yet been decided.

               The only prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the representation of the petitioner dated 28.4.2006 may be directed to be decided by respondent no. 1 within a time bound period as this Court deems just and proper in the circumstances of the case.

                The standing counsel has no objection to this prayer.

                 In the circumstances, the petition is disposed of finally with a direction to respondent no.1 Special Secretary, State of U.P. ( Madhyamik Shiksha Anubhag to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 28.4.2006 by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of submission of a certified copy of this order.  The petitioner shall file a certified copy of this order before respondent no. 1 within one week from today.

Dated: 12.7.2006

CPP/-

           


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.