Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

GEORGE STEPHEN versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


George Stephen v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 38900 of 2004 [2006] RD-AH 11409 (13 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No.27

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.38900  of 2004

George Stephen

Vs.

State of U.P.  and others

Hon. Sanjay Misra, J.

Heard Sri I.P.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.D.Saunders, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.2, Committee of Management.

By means of this writ petition, the petitioner seeks issue of a   writ of mandamus against respondent no.2 to pay the petitioner's provident fund amount  along with interest as also to pay salary of two months i.e. June 2000 and June 2001. Counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit have been filed.

With the consent of the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of in the following terms:-

1. The petitioner may approach the respondent no.2 by means of an application for redressal of his grievance as claimed in the writ petition within one month from today along with certified copy of this order.

2. Upon such representation being filed before respondent no.2, the  respondent no.2 shall consider the same sympathetically and in accordance with law so that the grievance of the petitioner is properly decided.

Sri A.D.Saunders learned counsel for respondent no.2 states that upon the representation being filed it will be decided without raising any technical objection such as the resignation of the petitioner  has not been accepted by the respondent no.2 till date.

-2-

3. The representation as aforesaid shall be decided by the respondent no.2 within a period of two months.

The decision taken by the Committee of Management will be communicated to the petitioner  on his address for which the petitioner shall supply to the Committee of Management a self addressed duly stamped envelop( for registered post).

The writ petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms. No order is passed as to costs..

13.7.06

Gc.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.