Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Rakesh Kumar Pandey And Others v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 2582 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 1141 (17 January 2006)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari ,J

           Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

              The counsel for the petitioners states that in a bunch of similar writ petition being no. 76049 of 2005, 30.1.2006 has been fixed and the following order was passed after hearing the counsel for the parties.

          "Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari, J

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

An amendment application has been filed by the petitioners challenging the allocation of weightage/marks given to the candidates appearing in the ensuing examination of conductors in the respondent-Corporation.

Sri Samir Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation submits that the respondents have no objection to the amendment and he does not seek any time to file objection to the same.

In this view of the matter the amendment application is allowed. Let the amendment be incorporated within three days. The amended copy of the writ petition shall be submitted before this Court within a week.  

It has been brought to the notice of the Court by the learned counsel for the parties that the examination is going to be held from 16th January to 20th January 2006 of the remaining candidates including the petitioners and the second and third stage examinations in respect of other candidates have already held.  

Let the petitioners be permitted to appear in the examination from 16th January to 20th January 2006. However, it is provided that till further orders of this Court, the final result of the examination in pursuance of the advertisements dated 20.11.2005 and 4.1.2006 shall not be declared.

List this case for 30.1.2006, on which date a copy of the result of the examination held shall be produced before the Court."

      The counsel for the parties states that this case may be connected along with aforesaid writ petition no.76049 of 2005 and the order dated 12.1.2006 be passed in the present writ petition.

     The petitioners of this writ petition are also governed by the order dated 12.1.2006.

Dated 16.1.2006




Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.