Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHAMSHAD & ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Shamshad & Another v. State Of U.P. & Another - APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 7859 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 11572 (16 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants sand learned A.G.A.

This application has been filed by  applicants Shamshad and Rohtash with a prayer to quash the proceedings of  Case No. 15 of 1992, under Sections 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, pending in the court of Special Judge, Gangsters Act, Meerut.

From the perusal of the record, it appears that on the basis of the 2 cases the F.I.R. of this case has been lodged against the applicants and the proceedings are pending in the court since 1991 and no witnesses has been turned up till now, therefore, the proceedings may be quashed.

Learned A.G.A. opposed this contention by submitting that it is not a proper ground to quash the proceedings.

 

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants, I am of the view that the grounds taken by the learned counsel for the applicants for quashing the proceedings is not proper, therefore, the prayer for quashing the proceedings is refused.

However, considering the facts that the proceedings of the trial of this case is being delayed, the Special Judge, Gangsters Act, Meerut is directed  to expedite the proceedings of the trail and no unnecessary adjournment shall be granted. The proceedings shall be concluded expeditiously, if possible within a period of 6 months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

With the above directions the application is finally disposed of.

Dated: 17.07.06

Rcv/7859-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.