Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

C/M UCHCHATTAR MADHYAMIK VIDYALAYA THRU' MANAGER & ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


C/M Uchchattar Madhyamik Vidyalaya Thru' Manager & Another v. State Of U.P. & Others - SPECIAL APPEAL No. 746 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 11689 (18 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No.32

Special Appeal No. 746 of 2006

Committee of Management  and another .....Petitioners

Versus

Committee of Management and others .....Respondents

*****

Hon'ble S.Rafat Alam, J.

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal ,J.

Having heard Sri P.K.Jain, learned counsel for the appellants, Sri G.K.Singh, learned counsel for respondents no.1 and 2 and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents no. 3 and 4, we are of the view that this appeal does not lie at this stage as the order impugned in the appeal is not a judgment.

Special appeal against the judgment of Hon'ble Single Judge lies under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules of the Court.  Since by the impugned order rights of the parties have not been decided and as an interim measure the Hon'ble Single Judge has appointed the authorised controller to manage the affairs of the institution in question, it cannot be held to be a "judgment" and thus the appeal is not  maintainable.

However, in the facts of the case, we are of the view that the writ petition itself requires an early disposal because the term of Committee of Management is expiring in the year 2007. Sri P.K.Jain, Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the counter affidavit in the writ petition will be filed within a week. Sri G.K.Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondents no.1 and 2 also submits that he will file rejoinder to the counter affidavit within one week thereafter. We, therefore, request the Hon'ble Single Judge to decide the writ petition itself on merit at an early date subject to other business of the Court.

With the above observations, the special appeal stands dismissed.

Dated:18.7.2006

SKM


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.