Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VIKRAM SINGH JOSHA versus STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Vikram Singh Josha v. State Of U.P. And Another - WRIT - C No. 37205 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 11752 (18 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.

Hon. Dilip Gupta, J.

Supplementary affidavit filed today be taken on record.

This writ petition has been filed for seeking benefit of the Government Order dated 16.2.1994 (Annexure ''3' to the writ petition) by which it has been provided that there shall be reservation up to the extent of 23% for SC/ST candidates and 27% for the OBC candidates while making appointment of the District Government Counsel (Civil, Criminal or Revenue).

The grievance of the petitioner is that the appointment of the DGC (Civil) is being made in contravention of the said Government Order. Learned Standing Counsel could not satisfy us as under what law or competence the Government Order dated 16.2.1994 was issued since engagement of a lawyer cannot be termed as a service and is a contractual appointment.

Instructions may, therefore be taken as to whether this Government Order is still in force and if it is in force then how was such a Government Order issued and how it is to be enforced in view of the Constitution Bench judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in R.K. Sabharwal & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Ors. (1995) 2 SCC 745.

Learned Standing Counsel may seek instructions within ten days.

List after ten days for admission/hearing.

Till then, if any appointment is made, the same shall be subject to the decision of the writ petition.

Let a copy of this order be made available to the learned Standing Counsel today itself.

Dt/- 18.7.2006

Sharma/37205


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.