Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MOHD. AUSAF AHMAD ANSARI & OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mohd. Ausaf Ahmad Ansari & Others v. State Of U.P. & Others - SPECIAL APPEAL No. 758 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 11790 (19 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble S.Rafat Alam, J.

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.

Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants contended that all the appellants were appointed after due selection. It is submitted that 17 posts of Class-IV Employees were advertised by advertisement dated 15.5.1998 and after due selection, i.e., written test and interview held on 27.6.1998 a select list of 39 candidates was prepared by the Selection Committee. Pursuant thereto they were appointed against Class-IV posts on various dates.  It has further been claimed that the petitioners-appellants are working almost about six years and now their services have been terminated without affording any opportunity or show cause. It is further contended that after termination of the services of the petitioners-appellants, the District Judge has made several appointments against the post of Malies and Chaukidars without advertisement and without undertaking process of selection and those appointees are being allowed to continue to work against the post held by the petitioners-appellants. He further referred to the statements made in paras 7 and 8 of the writ petition and also in para-7 of the counter affidavit.

Admit.

Sri K.R.Sirohi, learned counsel appears for respondents no.2 and 3. Learned Standing Counsel appears for respondent no.1.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions and looking to the facts of the case, it is provided that until further orders of this Court, the respondents shall not make any appointment pursuant to the interview which is scheduled to be held on 23.7.2006.

List the appeal for hearing at an early date along with the record of the writ petition.

Dated: 19.7.2006

SKM/758/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.