Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHEELU LOHAR versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sheelu Lohar v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 11223 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 11898 (20 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Sheelu Lohar   indicted in case crime No. 872    of  2006 under sections  8/20 of  N.D.P.S. Act  P.S. Kotwali  District Jhansi.

Heard Shri Rajiv Lochan Shukla and Shri Rajiv Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that 360 gm. Charas is said to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant. The learned counsel argued that there are no public witnesses to the recovery and compliance of provisions of section 50 of N.D.P.S Act was not made. The learned counsel argued that the applicant is on bail in all the previous criminal cases.

The learned A.G.A. submitted that applicant being  a man of criminal antecedent he will commit other offences if released on bail.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The quantity of Charas seized is less than commercial quantity. There are no public witnesses to the recovery. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Sheelu Lohar   indicted in case crime No. 872    of  2006 under sections  8/20 of N.D.P.S. Act  P.S. Kotwali  District Jhansi, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/11223/06

20.7.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.