Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

A.K. JAIN & ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


A.K. Jain & Another v. State Of U.P. & Others - APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 8348 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 12113 (25 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A.

This application has been filed by the applicants A.K. Jain and A.K. Verma with a prayer that the order dated 24.6.2005 passed by the learned In-charge A.C.M.M., Court No. 7, Kanpur Nagar whereby the application under Sections 156(3) Cr. P. C. was allowed and   the S.H..O.  of Police Station concerned was directed  to register a case and investigate the same in exercise of power conferred under Sections 156(3) Cr. P. C. , may be set aside.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the  impugned order is illegal which has not been passed in accordance with the provision of law even the police report was not considered by the learned Magistrate.

It is opposed by the learned A.G.A. by submitting that there is no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order because from the perusal of the allegations made in the application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. prima facie cognizable offence is made out against the applicants. The order is well reasoned and prefect.

From the perusal of the application under Section 156(3)  it appears that on the basis of the allegation made therein prima facie cognizable offence is made out against the applicants and the allegations are of such nature which requires investigation by the police. Therefore, there is no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order. Therefore, the  prayer for setting aside the impugned order is refused.

It is further contended that the applicants are men of peace loving. The allegations made against them are not of grave in nature. In case they are arrested and sent to jail during the investigation of the case registered against them, they shall suffer for irreparable loss.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. it is directed that the applicants shall not be arrested during the pendency of the investigation of the case registered in pursuance of the above mentioned impugned order, but they shall co-operate with the investigation and  shall not tamper with the evidence.

With this direction the application  is finally disposed of.

Dt: 25.7.2006

Rcv8348--06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.