Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJENDRA SINGH BHADAURIA versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' PRINCIPAL SECY. OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Rajendra Singh Bhadauria v. State Of U.P. Thru' Principal Secy. Others - PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 39218 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 12202 (25 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ajoy Nath Ray, CJ

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan,J

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This writ petition has been filed as a public interest litigation praying for a mandamus directing the District Magistrate, Auraiya to get the matter investigated of preparation of list of Antyodaya and B.P.L. ration card of villages Raipur, Dharmangadpur, Nandpur.

The complaint of the writ petitioner is that the list of Antyodaya and B.P.L. ration card has not been correctly prepared with regard to above mentioned three villages. Several irregularities have been committed. The preparation of Antyodaya and B.P.L. ration card and implementation of other schemes of the State Government with regard to villages in question are the matters for the authorities entrusted under the said scheme to implement and correct the error if any. We are satisfied that this is not a fit case for being entertained as a public interest litigation with regard to correction of the list with regard to three villages mentioned above. In P.I.L. this Court cannot monitor or supervise the various schemes of the State Government. Implementing the State Government's schemes is the responsibility of the administration.

It is open for the petitioner to bring into the notice of the administrative authorities who are entrusted to correct or remove the errors and irregularities with regard to implementation of the Government's schemes. We have no doubt that if attention of the authorities is invited, they may look into the irregularities and some decision may be taken.

With the above observation, the petition is dismissed.

Dated:25.7.2006

RK/(39218-06)


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.