Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAN VIJAYA SINGH versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ran Vijaya Singh v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 15162 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 12422 (27 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Ran Vijaya Singh   indicted in case crime No. 33   of  2006 under sections 307  I.P.C. and 12/14 of Dacoity Affected Area Act P.S. Chilla  District Banda.

Heard Shri Awdhesh Rai, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is said to have fired at the police party but none of the police personnel sustained injuries. The learned counsel argued that recovery of one country made pistol of .315 bore and one live cartridge is alleged to have been made from the possession of the applicant.

The learned A.G.A. argued that there is criminal history of six cases against the applicant and in case he is released on bail, he will commit other offences.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

It is a case of no injury. The applicant was arrested in a police encounter case and recovery of country made pistol and live cartridge is said to have been made from his possession.  In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Ran Vijaya Singh   indicted in case crime No. 33   of  2006 under sections 307  I.P.C. and 12/14 of Dacoity Affected Area Act P.S. Chilla  District Banda , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/15162/06

27.7.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.