Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Anil Kumar Sharma & Others v. State Of U.P.& Others - WRIT - A No. 47929 of 2000 [2006] RD-AH 12457 (28 July 2006)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Court No.1.

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 47929 of 2000

Anil Kumar Sharma and others V. State of U.P. and others.


Hon. Ran Vijai Singh,J.

This petition has been filed by one Anil Kumar Sharma s/o Sri Hub Lal Sharma, r/o 54, Chhota Baghara, Prayag, Allahabad and Rajendra Prasad s/o Sri Ram Akshayabar, r/o 331/71, Ka, Saketnagar, Teliarganj, Allahabad seeking following reliefs:-

"(a) to issue a writ/order/direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to declare the result  of interview held on 15.3.99 regarding the appointment of stenographer (Group-C) under the notification dt. 8.8.99 issued by the respondent No.3  within the period specified by this Hon'ble Court.

(b) to issue a writ/ order/ direction in the nature mandamus commanding the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation dt. 29.2.2000, 27,6.2000 and 13.7.2000 & 3.10.2000 by reasoned and speaking orders within the period specified by this Hon'ble Court.

(c) to pass such other and further which it may deem just and proper.

(d) to ward the cost of petition."

Smt. Rathi, learned Standing Counsel appearing  for the respondents, states that final result of the examination  in question  has been declared in the year 2001 and after the declaration of the result the selected candidates  have joined their duties in July,2001. Learned Counsel appearing  for the petitioners raised no objection to it.

In view of the statement made by the learned Standing Counsel, it is apparent that the grievance of the petitioners, has already been redressed. Therefore, no cause of action survive and the writ petition is dismissed.

Dt. 28.7.2006.



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.