Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Mewa Lal Mandal And Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 15277 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 12483 (28 July 2006)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants are not named in the F.I.R. and there is no direct eye witness account in the present case. The case is based on circumstantial evidence. The only evidence against the applicants is that they had made an extra judicial confession before one Anil Mandal. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants have not made any confessional statement before any person and nothing incriminating was recovered from their possession or on their pointing out.

It is opposed by the learned A.G.A. by submitting that the case is of year 1993. The applicants were avoided their arrest. Ultimately they were arrested from Delhi and they are resident of  Bihar. In such circumstances, the possibility of their absconding is too much,  in case they are released on bail.

After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and  the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants  and without expressing any opinion on the the merits of the case, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Mewa Lal Mandal and Nand Lal   involved in Case Crime No. 99  of 1993, under Section 302 I.P.C., Police Station Vijai Nagar, District Ghaziabad  be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two  sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. with the condition that:-

1.the applicants shall appear before the police station concerned in the first week of each month till the conclusion of the trial,

2.They shall not tamper with the evidence,

3. the sureties shall be of heavy amount and of district Ghaziabad,

in default of any condition the bail granted to them shall automatically deemed to be cancelled.

Dt: 28.7.2006

Rcv/ 15277-06


Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.