Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJA BHAIYA YADAV versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Raja Bhaiya Yadav v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 15254 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 12489 (28 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Raja Bhaiya Yadav   indicted in case crime No. 39  of 2006  under sections 394, 342, 307  I.P.C. and 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act P.S. Baberu   District Banda.

Heard Shri D.D. Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant had fought election of Pradhan against Munna Singh and he has been falsely implicated due to enmity of election. The learned counsel urged that no recovery of looted property has been made from the possession of the applicant though he was arrested at the spot. The learned counsel contended that incident had taken place at 8.30 P.M. but the First Information Report was lodged at 2.30 A.M. i.e. after a delay of about six hours.

The learned A.G.A. submitted that applicant opened fire at  Munna Singh and caused him injury and was arrested at the spot.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The applicant was arrested at the spot but no recovery of looted property was made from his possession. The applicant was medically examined the same day at 4.15 A.M. and nine injuries were found on his person. It being a case of no recovery, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Raja Bhaiya Yadav   indicted in case crime No. 39  of 2006  under sections 394, 342, 307  I.P.C. and 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act P.S. Baberu   District Banda , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/15254/06

28.7.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.