Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJ KUMAR versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Raj Kumar v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 15438 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 12673 (1 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is husband of the deceased. The F.I.R. of this case has been lodged by Radhey Shyam on 9.2.2006 at 11.50 a.m. The F.I.R. was lodged against the applicant and 4 other co-accused persons. The cause of death is burning. Dying declaration of the deceased was recorded by the learned S.D.M. According to dying declaration of the deceased her mother-in-law has committed the offence. It has been clearly stated by the deceased that her mother-in-law had poured kerosene oil. Thereafter, the deceased was set on fire by her and she was subjected to cruelty  by the mother-in-law of the deceased. She stated that she was never subjected to cruelty by her husband and never beaten by her husband. The case of the applicant is distinguishable with the case of Smt Sukhdei the mother-in-law of the deceased.

After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without entering into the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Raj Kumar   involved in Case Crime No. 68 of 2005, under Sections 498-A, 304-B I.P.C. and Sections ¾ Dowry Prohibition act, Police Station Chandausi , District Moradabad be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

Dt: 01.8.2006

Rcv/15438-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.