Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

S/S JANTA INT UDYOG versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


S/S Janta Int Udyog v. Commissioner Of Trade Tax - SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION DEFECTIVE No. 531 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 12826 (2 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court no. 43

Trade Tax Revision no.  (531) Of 2006.

S/S Janta Int Udyog, Ghazipur. ... Revisionist.

Versus

The Commissioner, Trade Tax, U. P. Lucknow. .... Opp. Party.

Hon'ble Rajes Kumar, J.

Present revision under section 11 of U.P. Trade Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") is directed against the order of Tribunal dated 01st,  October, 2003 relating to the assessment year 1999-2000 under the U. P. Trade Tax Act.  

Applicant was engaged in the business of manufacture and sales of bricks.  

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

Learned Counsel for the applicant submitted the estimate of firing period at 40 days as against the disclosed firing period at 24 days is unjustified.  Apart from the aforesaid submissions, no other argument has been made.  

I do not find any substance in the argument of learned Counsel for the applicant.  The applicant has disclosed the firing period from 07.3.2000 to 31.3.2000 for 24 days.   Before the Assessing Authority, applicant has produced Nikasi register, in which, Nikasi was shown from 01.3.2000 to 31.3.2000.  Since Nikasi was stared from 1st March, 2000 the firing could not start from 07.3.2000.  Firing must have been started prior to 01.3.2000, thus the estimate of firing period at 40 days cannot be said to be unjustified.

In the result, revision fails, and is, accordingly, dismissed.

Dt:02.08.2006.

MZ/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.