Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SOCIETY OF METRO GROUP FOR EDUCATION & MEDICAL RESEARCH versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Society Of Metro Group For Education & Medical Research v. State Of U.P. Thru' Principal Secretary And Others - WRIT - C No. 17238 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 13135 (7 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 17238 of 2006                              

Society of Metro Group for Education &

Medical Research. . . . . . . . . . . .  . . . . .  . .  . . . . . . . . . .. Petitioner.

                                   Versus

State of U.P. and others . . . . .  . . . . .  . . . .  . . .  . .  . . . .  Respondents.

        ----

Hon'ble A.K. Yog,J.

Hon'ble R.K.Rastogi,J.

This is a writ petition challenging the order dated 16.3.2006 ( Annexure no. 17 to the writ petition ) passed by respondent no. 3 and for a direction to respondent no. 3 to effect allotment of land as per advertisement dated 16.9..2005 in favour of the petitioner.

Heard  the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the contesting respondents and perused the record.

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh and comprehensive representation along with certified copy of this order as well as complete copy of  the Writ Petition with all Annexures before concerned competent authority within three weeks from today and on such representation being filed, as stipulated above, the concerned  competent authority shall decide the same   within twelve  weeks of the receipt of the representation as contemplated  above, exercising its unfettered discretion on the basis of record before him in accordance with relevant Rules, Government Orders, Scheme/Policy after hearing the parties concerned without being influenced by any of the observations in this judgment since this court has not entered into merits of the present case. Till decision of the representation of the petitioner, we direct  the respondents not to give effect to the order  contained in  letter dated 16.3.2006 ( Annexure no. 17 to the writ petition ) and further keep in reserve 30 acres of land proposed for allotment  to the petitioner, which shall be subject to the final decision to be taken by NOIDA on the petitioner's representation.

Writ Petition is finally disposed of subject to the above directions.

No order as to costs.

Dated: 7. 8..2006

RPP.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.