Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

HARPAL SINGH versus MANGLU

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Harpal Singh v. Manglu - CIVIL REVISION No. 309 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 13188 (8 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Umeshwar Pandey, J.

Heard learned counsel for the revisionist.

By the impugned order the trial court has closed the applicant-revisionist's evidence after the defendant himself was examined as D.W. 1. The court has refused the prayer of the defendant to adjourn the case to some other date simply because on the last three previous dates the adjournment had already been sought by the defendant  at the stage of final hearing.

Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the only witness of defendant left in the case was also to be examined on that date but due to personal difficulty, he could not reach the court and as such, the applicant was handicapped and could not produce him resulting into closure of his evidence by the impugned order. Learned counsel also submits that on the next date fixed in the case he would definitely produce that witness failing which his evidence may be closed thereafter. In case, he is not permitted to produce the only witness, irreparable injury would be caused to his case, which might result into miscarriage of justice.

Looking to the facts and circumstances, this revision petition is hereby disposed of with this direction that the trial court shall give only one opportunity to the defendant to produce his only witness before the court on the date already fixed in the case. It is also provided that if there is failure on any account in producing the witness, no further opportunity would be granted to the defendant in this regard.

08.08.2006

gp/309


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.