Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM AUTAR versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Autar v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 43135 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 13233 (8 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Janardan Sahai , J.

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Shailendra Yadav holding brief of Sri Jai Singh counsel for the Bank.

Petitioner had taken loan for agricultural purposes. According to the petitioner he could not pay the instalment amount due to unavoidable circumstances, which is sought to be recovered by coercive means. It is submitted that if reasonable time is allowed to pay the amount sought to be recovered, petitioner may be able to pay the same and irreparable injury on account of arrest and auction of property may be avoided.

To the aforesaid, learned counsel appearing for contesting respondent submits that although in some of the cases it has been said that against the recovery proceedings, unless some illegality is pointed out, the court may not interfere, but at the same time submission is that intention of the respondent bank has been never to cause any irreparable injury to the loanee rather the loan amount was advanced with the purpose to improve his future prospects and thus if for justifiable reason the amount in terms of the agreement has not been paid and now petitioner has bona fide intention to pay the amount within a reasonable time then  respondents may not have any objection.

Accordingly, this petition is disposed of finally with the following directions:-

(i) Petitioner may deposit the entire amount sought to be recovered directly with the contesting respondent no.4, Bank in three equal instalments.  In calculating the arrears the amount (if any) already paid will be adjusted.

(ii) The first instalment may be deposited by 8th September 2006 the second by 8th December 2006 and the third/last instalment by 8th March 2007. In case instalments are deposited with the contesting respondent within the aforesaid time then the recovery charges will not be recovered from the petitioner.

(iii) Petitioner may file an application for supply of statement of account along with duly stamped self addressed envelope. In case any such application is filed, the contesting respondent will give the same to the petitioners within fifteen days after the deposit of first instalment.

(iv) Property (agricultural land/tractor) belonging to the petitioner if attached will be released after the deposit of first instalment by the concerned Tehsil authority unless it has already been auctioned.

Let a certified copy of this order be supplied to the counsel for the petitioner on payment of usual charges within 24 hours.

Dated: 8.8.2006.

Sn/wp-43135/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.