Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM KISHORE GUPTA versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Kishore Gupta v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 16135 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 13239 (8 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Ram Kishore Gupta   indicted in case crime No. 159  of 2006  under sections  18/20 N.D.P.S. Act P.S. Barra  District Kanpur nagar.

Heard Shri Amit Saxena, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that 200 gm. Charas is said to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant. The learned counsel argued that there are no public witnesses to the recovery  and  compliance of provisions of sections  42, 50 and 57 of N.D.P.S. Act was not made.  The learned counsel contended that there is no criminal history of the applicant.

The learned A.G.A. argued that recovery of Charas weighing more than small quantity has been made from the possession of the applicant.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The quantity of recovered Charas is less than commercial quantity. There is no criminal history of the applicant. There are no public witnesses to the search and seizure. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Ram Kishore Gupta   indicted in case crime No. 159  of 2006  under sections  18/20 N.D.P.S. Act P.S. Barra  District Kanpur nagar , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/16135/06

8.8.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.