Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAVI & OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ravi & Others v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4484 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 13342 (10 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.

Hon'ble K.N. Ojha, J.

We have heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State. We have gone through the judgment under appeal.

Admit.

Office is directed to summon the trial court record within a period of six weeks.

It is contended on behalf of the appellants that all the four appellants were carrying lathies and they were on bail in the court below and did not misuse the liberty allowed to them. It is further contended that death of Surajbhan was caused as a result of gun shot wounds. Besides two injured, Jitendra and Satyendra sustained firearm injuries in the course of incident. So far as injury of Munendra is concerned, injury no.3 was caused by lathi and that too on the left palm of the hand.

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the grant of bail mainly on the ground that one person was killed and three others sustained injuries in the course of incident and as such, the appellants do not deserve bail.

After having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties and impugned judgment as well as material on record, we find it appropriate to enlarge the appellants on bail during pendency of appeal.

Let the appellants-Ravi, Jagpal, Nema and Binnami be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bulandshahar in S.T. No. 292 of 1992 State Vs. Kunwar Pal and others.

The appellants are allowed six weeks time to deposit the entire amount of fine in the court below.

10.8.2006

OP/4484/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.