Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHAKIL versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Shakil v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 16212 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 13350 (10 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant       Shakil involved in case Crime No. 180 of 2006 under sections 489-Ka, 489-Kha, 489-Ga, 489-Gha and 489-Da I.P.C., Police station Rampur, district Saharanpur.

Heard Sri S. Wajid Ali, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that recovery of fake currency notes is said to have been made from the possession of the applicant. The learned counsel urged that machinery and other items were recovered from the possession of co-accused Rajesh.

The learned AGA argued that recovery of fake currency notes as well as printers etc. was also made from the joint possession of the applicant and co-accused.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

From the personal search of the applicant fake currency notes were recovered. Recovery of instruments, printer etc. was made from the possession of the co-accused Rajesh. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Shakil involved in case Crime No. 180 of 2006 under sections 489-Ka, 489-Kha, 489-Ga, 489-Gha and 489-Da I.P.C., Police station Rampur, district Saharanpur, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

D/-10.8.2006

Mahmood-16212-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.