Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

AMRIT LAL versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Amrit Lal v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 16520 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 13374 (11 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is father-in-law of the deceased. The deceased died due to burn injuries. The deceased was brought to the hospital by Jamuna Prasad the elder brother of the applicant and the first informant was properly informed , who came at the hospital. In his presence  the deceased died. The inquest report was prepared on 2.5.2006. At that time first informant and other persons were also present. The first informant is the witnesses of the inquest report also. At that time no allegation was made against the applicant and other co-accused persons, but thereafter, the F.I.R. has been lodged on 5.5.2006. The allegation made against the applicant and other co-accused persons are general in nature and the case of the applicant is distinguishable with the case of the husband of the deceased.

After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without entering into the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Amrit Lal  involved in Case Crime No. 156  of 2006,under Sections 498-A, 304-B I.P.C. and Sections ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Khuthan, District Jaunpur be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

Dt: 11.8.2006

Rcv16520/-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.