Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VIRENDRA versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Virendra v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 16258 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 13450 (11 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Virendra involved in case Crime No. 213 of 2006 under sections 392, 120-B, 411 I.P.C., Police station Kotwali, district Hathras.

Heard Sri Nasiruzzaman, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the name of the applicant came to light from the confessional statement of co-accused Shiv Kumar alias Bhallu. The learned counsel argued that no recovery of looted cash was made from the possession of the applicant. The learned counsel contended that co-accused Shiv Kumar alias Bhallu in his confessional statement has stated that the applicant had knowledge about cash transactions.

The learned AGA argued that the applicant is an ex-employee of U.P.S.R.T.C. and was dismissed from service. The learned counsel argued that the applicant being an employee of roadways he had knowledge about the dealings of cash.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

No recovery of looted cash was made from the possession of the applicant. The name of the applicant came to light from the confessional statement of co-accused. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Virendra involved in case Crime No. 213 of 2006 under sections 392, 120-B, 411 I.P.C., Police station Kotwali, district Hathras, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

D/-11.8.2006

Mahmood-16258-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.