Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DAFEDAR SINGH versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Dafedar Singh v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 43383 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 13469 (17 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

  Court No.10

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 43383 of 2006                              

Dafedar Singh . . . . . . .  . . . .  .  . . .. .  . .  . . . . . . . . ...  . .  . Petitioner.

                                   Versus

State of U.P. and others . . . . .  . . . . .  . . . .  . . .  . .  . . . .  Respondents.

        ----

Hon'ble A.K. Yog,J.

Hon'ble R.K.Rastogi,J.

This is a writ petition for a writ of mandamus directing the  respondents to complete election of  the Members of the Committee of Management  of Janpriya Sahakari Awas Samiti Ltd. Agra in accordance with  Rule 432 of the U.P. Co-operative Societies Rules, 1968 and further to hold  election of the office bearers of  the   said Committee of Management.

Heard  the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned  Counsel for the contesting  respondents and perused the record.

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh and comprehensive representation along with certified copy of this order as well as complete copy of  the Writ Petition with all Annexures before respondent  no. 2 within two weeks from today and on such representation being filed, as stipulated above, the concerned  respondent  shall decide the same   within  six weeks of the receipt of the representation as contemplated  above, exercising its unfettered discretion on the basis of record before him in accordance with relevant Rules, Government Orders, Scheme/Policy after hearing the parties concerned without being influenced by any of the observations in this judgment since this court has not entered into merits of the present case.

Writ Petition is finally disposed of subject to the above directions.

No order as to costs.

Dated: 17. 8.2006

RPP.    


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.