High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Shailendra Kumar v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 43824 of 2006  RD-AH 13546 (17 August 2006)
Hon. Yatindra Singh,J.
Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh,J.
1. This is a writ petition for a direction to the Police authority not to disturb the hoarding of the petitioner.
2. We have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel for the respondents.
3. Petitioner is permitted to implead respondent no. 4.
4. Learned standing counsel submits that no hoarding can be put up without permission of the local authority. It is not necessary to decide this question at this stage.
5. In the circumstances of the case,the petitioner may file a representation before respondent No.4. In case any such representation is filed, it may be decided by respondent No.4 by a speaking order, if possible, within one month from the date of receipt of the representation. The petitioner will file certified copy of this order, other necessary documents and a duly stamped self-addressed envelop along with the representation. The respondent No. 4 after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.
6. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.