Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ANOOP SINGH versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Anoop Singh v. State Of U.P. & Others - APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 656 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 1355 (19 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

This application is filed by the applicant  with a prayer that charge sheet of the case crime no. 277 of 2004, under Sections 120-B I.P.C., P.S. Rohniya, district Varanasi may be quashed.

It is  contended that the  applicant that prior to filling of the charge sheet against the applicant a charge sheet was submitted by the I.O. against the other co-accused persons in which it was clearly mentioned that no evidence could be collected against the applicant, but subsequently the charge sheet has been submitted against the applicant. It is further contended that  during investigation the evidence collected by the I.O. was not sufficient to proceed further against the applicant and on the basis of the evidence collected by the I.O. no offence under Section 120-B I.PC. is made out.

It is opposed by the learned A.G.A. that at this stage appreciation of the evidence cannot be done.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants it is directed that the applicant shall file objection through his counsel before the court concerned within 20 days from today and the same shall be disposed within three weeks thereafter. Till the disposal of the objection the N.B.W. issued against the applicant shall be kept in abeyance. With the above direction the application is finally disposed of.

Dated: 19.01.06

Rcv/656-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.