SMT. RUBI DEVI AND ANTOHER versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Smt. Rubi Devi And Antoher v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 43832 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 13557 (17 August 2006)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.

Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh,J.

1. We have heard counsel for petitioner and standing counsel.

2. The petitioners have averred in the writ petition that:

They are major and are aged about 24 years and 26 years.

Their marriage has been solemnized on 27.12.2005;and

They are being harassed by the respondents.

3. The petitioners are present in the Court and have reiterated the averments in the writ petition.

4. In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the respondents may not harass the petitioners. In case there is any criminal or civil case then that may be decided in accordance with law.

5. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.

Dt. 17.8.2006

A.K.-43832/06

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.