Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BABU GOPAL BINNANI versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Babu Gopal Binnani v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 44048 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 13597 (18 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

   Court No.10

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 44048 of 2006                              

Babu Gopal  Binnani . . .  . . . .  .  . . .. .  . .  . . . . . .   . .  . Petitioners.

                                   Versus

State  of U.P. and other  . . . . .  . . . .  . . .  . .  . . . .   . . . .Respondents.

        ----

Hon'ble A.K. Yog,J.

Hon'ble R.K.Rastogi,J.

This is a writ petition for a direction to the respondent nos. 2 and  3 to effect mutation of the name of  the petitioner in the  municipal records as per approval dated 1.8.2001  Annexure no. 5 to the writ petition).

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as  learned Standing Counsel and perused the pleadings contained in the writ petition.

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh and comprehensive representation along with certified copy of this order as well as complete copy of  the Writ Petition with all Annexures before concerned competent authority within three weeks from today and on such representation being filed, as stipulated above, the concerned  competent authority shall decide the same   within twelve  weeks of the receipt of the representation as contemplated  above, exercising its unfettered discretion on the basis of record before him in accordance with relevant Rules, Government Orders, Scheme/Policy after hearing the parties concerned without being influenced by any of the observations in this judgment since this court has not entered into merits of the present case.

Writ Petition is finally disposed of subject to the above directions.

No order as to costs.

Dated: 18. 8.2006

RPP.  


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.