High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Ram Lakhan Singh v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 42141 of 2006  RD-AH 13669 (18 August 2006)
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar, J.
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
The petitioner aggrieved by the order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Atarra, Banda dated 16th September, 2002, whereby an application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the contesting respondents has been allowed, preferred a revision before the revisional authority. The revisional authority vide its order dated 17th February, 2006 dismissed the revision and maintained the order passed by the trial Court. Thus, this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
From the perusal of the orders impugned in this writ petition, it is apparent that none of the rights of the petitioner has yet been adjudicated upon. In this circumstance, I do not find it to be a fit case for interference with the impugned orders. It is always open to the petitioner to raise his grievance before the revisional Court as have been raised before the trial Court with regard to the application filed by the contesting respondents.
With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition is dismissed. However, there will be no order as to costs.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.