Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KALLU @ KALUA versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Kallu @ Kalua v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 16981 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 13743 (19 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Kallu alias Kalua involved in case Crime No. 69 of 2006 under sections 394 I.P.C.  Police station Mirhanchi, district Etah.

Heard Sri Rajeev Chaddha, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Manoj Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is not named in the first information report and his name came to fore from the confessional statement of co-accused. The learned counsel urged that no test identification parade was conducted. According to the learned counsel no recovery of looted jewellery and cash was made from the possession of the applicant.

The learned AGA argued that there is criminal history of 11 cases against the applicant and the applicant is said to have opened fire  at the victim.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

No recovery of looted property was made from the possession of the applicant. No test identification was conducted. The applicant is not named in the first information report. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Kallu alias Kalua involved in case Crime No. 69 of 2006 under sections 394 I.P.C.,  Police station Mirhanchi, district Etah, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

D/-19.8.2006

Mahmood-16981-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.