High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
M/S Bajaj Parivahan Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 37833 of 2006  RD-AH 13748 (19 August 2006)
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh,J.
1. The vehicle of the petitioner has been seized under section 207 of the Motor Vehicles Act. Hence, he has filed the present writ petition.
2. We have heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel for respondents.
3. We have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel for the respondents.
3. In the circumstances of the case,the petitioner may file a representation before respondent No. 4. In case any such representation is filed, it may be decided by respondent No. 4 by a speaking order, if possible, within one month from the date of receipt of the representation. The petitioner will file certified copy of this order, other necessary documents and a duly stamped self-addressed envelop along with the representation. The respondent No. 4 after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.
4. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.