Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SONU versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sonu v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 16951 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 13798 (19 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Sonu   indicted in case crime No. 116  of 2006  under sections 307, 394, 411  I.P.C. P.S. Nagal  District Sharanpur.

Heard Shri Anurag Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that there has been heated exchange between the informant and applicant over the felling of motorcycle of which applicant was riding and the complainant falsely implicated him on that score.

The learned A.G.A. argued that the applicant and co-accused snatched mobile and cash of Rs. 500/- from the complainant and captured by the villagers at the spot and recovery of looted cash of Rs. 500/- was made from the possession of the applicant.  

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

This is a case of no injury. The recovery of cash of Rs. 500/- is said to have been made from the possession of the applicant.The recovered cash of Rs. 500/- does not bear any identifying  marks. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Sonu   indicted in case crime No. 116  of 2006  under sections 307, 394, 411  I.P.C. P.S. Nagal  District Sharanpur , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/16951/06

19.8.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.