High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Babar v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4706 of 2006  RD-AH 13830 (21 August 2006)
Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.
Hon'ble Barkat Ali Zaidi, J.
We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State. We have gone through the judgment under appeal.
Office is directed to summon the trial court record within a period of six weeks.
It is contended that the appellant is brother-in-law of the deceased and had no concern and was falsely implicated.
On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has submitted that appellant poured kerosene oil on the body of the deceased and Shaukat set fire.
Having considered the role assigned to the appellant in the crime, we find it appropriate to enlarge the appellant on bail during pendency of appeal.
Let the appellant-Babar be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Rampur in S.T. No. 437 of 1997 State Vs. Smt. Rabiya Begum and others.
If the appellant deposits a sum of Rs.3,000/- as fine in the court below within a period of one month from today, the recovery of remaining amount of fine shall remain stayed.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.