Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ISUF versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Isuf v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 16900 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 13863 (21 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Isuf  indicted in case crime No. 732  of 2004  under sections420, 467, 468, 471  I.P.C. P.S. Sehani Gate  District Gahaziabad .

Heard Shri M.L Rai , learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that account opening form was presented by Bhupendra Singh Field Officer.The learned counsel submitted that co-accused Sunil Kumar who had accompanied Bhupendra Singh and identified Satish Kumar Bajaj has been enlarged on bail by the trial court. The learned counsel submitted that applicant had neither introduced nor identified the person in whose name the account was opened. The learned counsel contended that main accused Bhupendra Singh has obtained  stay of his arrest from this court.

The learned A.G.A. argued that applicant in his capacity as clerk of Maha Medha Urban Cooperative Bank Noida had filled account opening form and had signed it.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The account was got opened by Bhupendra Singh, Field Officer. The co-accused Sunil Kumar has identified the person in whose name the account was opened. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Isuf  indicted in case crime No. 732  of 2004  under sections420, 467, 468, 471  I.P.C. P.S. Sehani Gate  District Gahaziabad  , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/16900/06

21.8.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.