Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MANOJ KUMAR RAI versus SMT. NEET CHAUDHARY, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, M.H.F.W. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Manoj Kumar Rai v. Smt. Neet Chaudhary, Principal Secretary, M.H.F.W. & Others - CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. 1632 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 13894 (21 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. S.P. Mehrotra, J.

As there is no sitting in Court No.9 today, the work of Court No. 9 has been transferred to this Court.

The present case is tied-up with Hon'ble Sunil Ambwani, J.. However, as Dr. Sudarshan Singh (opposite party no.2), presently posted as the Chief Medical Officer, Ghazipur is personally present today before the Court pursuant to the order dated 25.7.2006 passed by Hon'ble Sunil Ambwani, J., I am proceeding to take-up the matter for noting personal presence of Dr. Sudarshan Singh.

Shri Prabhakar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner - applicant, Shri J.K. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel and Shri Rajeshwar Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party no.5, are present.

Pursuant to the order dated 25.7.2006, Dr. Sudarshan Singh, presently posted as the Chief Medical Officer, Ghazipur is personally present before the Court, and he is identified by Shri J.K. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel.

Further, Rajendra Singh (opposite party no.5) is also personally present before the Court today, and he is identified by Shri Rajeshwar Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party no.5.

The said Dr. Sudarshan Singh (opposite party no.2) as well as the said Rajendra Singh (opposite party no.5) will be personally present before the Court on the next date fixed in the matter.

Shri Rajeshwar Tiwari states that he has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no.5 in the Registry on 10.8.2006. The said Vakalatnama is not on record.

Office is directed to trace the same, and place it on record.

List on 29.8.2006 before the appropriate Bench.

The name of Shri Rajeshwar Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party no.5 will be shown in the Cause List when the case is listed next.

Dt. 21.8.2006

safi


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.