High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Shiv Kumar @ Munna v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4630 of 2006  RD-AH 13944 (21 August 2006)
Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.
Hon'ble Barkat Ali Zaidi, J.
We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State. We have gone through the judgment under appeal.
Connect this appeal with Criminal Appeal No. 4443 of 2006 and Criminal Appeal No. 4415 of 2006.
Office is directed to summon the trial court record within a period of six weeks.
It is contended on behalf of the appellant that no specific role has been assigned to present appellant and other co-accused have already been bailed out by this Court. Admittedly, no recovery was made from the possession of the appellant.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on behalf of the parties, we are of the opinion that appellant is also entitled to bail during pendency of appeal.
Let the appellant-Shiv Kumar @ Munna be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Meerut in S.T. No. 87 of 1999 State Vs. Nausad and others.
If the appellant deposits a sum of Rs.5,000/- as fine in the court below within a period of one month from today, the recovery of remaining amount of fine shall remain stayed.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.