Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MANOJ versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Manoj v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 17067 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 14029 (22 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Manoj   indicted in case crime No. 311  of 2006  under sections 306, 323 and 498-A,   I.P.C. P.S Mansoorpur  District Muzaffar Nagar.

Heard Shri G.P. Dikshit, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that marriage had taken place ten years before the incident and there was no demand of dowry. The learned counsel argued that the applicant's wife committed suicide by consuming sulphas. The learned counsel pointed out that victim was taken to N.K. Tygai Nursing Home at Khatauli by the applicant and his father but she could not be saved in spite of best efforts. The learned counsel pointed out that no mark of injury was found on the person of the deceased at the time of inquest and autopsy.

The learned A.G.A. argued that  victim was mother of three children therefore there is no reason to take sulphas. According to learned counsel the applicant and his family members abetted for commission of suicide by harassing her

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The marriage of the deceased took place about ten years before and she was  mother of three children. The victim committed suicide by consuming sulphas. No injury was found on the person of the deceased as evident from the postmortem certificate. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Manoj   indicted in case crime No. 311  of 2006  under sections 306, 323 and 498-A,I.P.C. P.S Mansoorpur  District Muzaffar Nagar , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/17067/06

22.8.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.