Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KAMLESH SINGH versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' SECRE. RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Kamlesh Singh v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secre. Rural Development And Others - WRIT - A No. 3754 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 1406 (19 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

HON. ARUN TANDON, J.

Petitioner who is employed as Records Clerk in the Rural Development  Department of the State of U.P. is aggrieved by an order of transfer dated 7.1.2006 whereunder the petitioner has been transferred from Ghazipur Sadar to Block Manihari within the same district.

This order is being challenged on the ground that by means of an earlier order dated 24.12.2005 the petitioner was similarly transferred from Block Sadar to Bhadaura.  However, on the representation being made by the petitioner disclosing the ailment suffered by his wife (fracture of hip bone), this order of transfer was cancelled under order dated 31.12.2005.  Counsel for the petitioner submits that the circumstances as were existing on 31.12.2005 have not changed in any manner and, therefore, issuance of fresh order is legally not justified.  The arguments raised on behalf of the petitioner appears to be attractive on its face value however on further enquiry being made counsel for the petitioner has stated that the wife of the petitioner is undergoing treatment at Varanasi.  In such circumstances this Court is of the opinion that no adverse impact would be made on the medical facility which is being availed  by the wife of the petitioner at Varanasi in case the petitioner is transferred from one Block to another within the same district of Ghazipur.

Writ petition is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed.

Dated: 19.1.2006

V.R./3754/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.