Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DHARAMPAL SINGH versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Dharampal Singh v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 17271 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 14361 (25 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Dharmapal Singh(HC 169)   indicted in case crime No. 344  of 2006  under sections 7/13 (1) (d) Prevention of Corruption Act  and section 120-B, 323 and 384  I.P.C. P.S. Kavi Nagar  District Ghaziabad.

Heard Shri G.S. Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that there is no evidence of receiving of illegal gratification against the applicant. According to learned counsel mere recovery of Rs. 1365/- from the possession of the applicant does not make out that the said amount was received as motive or reward.

The learned A.G.A. submitted that recovery of Rs. 1365/- was made from the possession of the applicant and he could not give satisfactory explanation about the said amount.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

There is no evidence of giving and taking   receiving as motive or reward. The recovery of sum of Rs. 1365/- alone can not be said to be incriminating. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Dharmapal Singh (HC 169)   indicted in case crime No. 344  of 2006  under sections 7/13 (1) (d) Prevention of Corruption Act  and section 120-B, 323 and 384  I.P.C. P.S. Kavi Nagar  District Ghaziabad , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/17271/06

25.8.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.