Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KALLOO & OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Kalloo & Others v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 17253 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 14369 (25 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicants Kalloo, Banwari Lal, Jai and Pradeep   indicted in case crime No. 997  of  2006 under sections 308, 323, 504, 506  I.P.C. and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act P.S Sadar Bazar, Jhansi.  District Jhansi.

Heard Shri Vivek Shandilya, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that applicants are said to have subjected the injured Santosh and Dhiraj to assault by wielding of lathis and sticks. The learned counsel submitted that injury no.2 of injured Dhiraj was kept under observation and in the X-ray fracture of left  humerous bone was found. The learned counsel argued that injuries no. 1,2,4,5,6, 10 and 12 of injured Santosh were kept under observation and in the X-ray no abnormality was found. According to the learned counsel injuries of injured Santosh shall be deemed to be of simple nature.

The learned A.G.A. argued that applicants subjected Santosh to assault and caused as many as 13 injuries and when Dhiraj intervened he was also assaulted.  

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

In the X-ray of injured Dhiraj fracture of left humerous bone of left hand was found. In the X-ray of injured Santosh no abnormality was found. Looking to the nature of injuries, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicants Kalloo, Banwari Lal, Jai and Pradeep   indicted in case crime No. 997  of  2006 under sections 308, 323, 504, 506  I.P.C. and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act P.S Sadar Bazar, Jhansi  District Jhansi , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/17253/06

25.8.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.