Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MAHENDRA KUMAR versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mahendra Kumar v. State Of U.P. - WRIT - A No. 23251 of 1993 [2006] RD-AH 14375 (25 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.

This writ petition has been filed  with the following prayers:-

" i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the suspension order dated 1.5.1993(annexure no.4 to the writ petition).

ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of interim mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 not to interfere in the functioning of the petitioner as Lekhpal in circle Pama, Tehsil Akbarpur, District Kanpur Dehat.

iii) to issue any other writ,order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

iv) to award cost of the petition."

Initially the writ petition was entertained and this Court has passed  an order on 7.7.1993 staying the operation of suspension dated 1.5.1993 for a period of three months. However, it was clarified that this order will not prevent the authority concerned to proceed  with the departmental enquiry which  was required to be completed as far as possible  within three months from the date of presentation of  certified copy of this order. Further, learned Standing Counsel was also granted six weeks time to file counter affidavit.

The case is on today's list. Learned Standing Counsel states that he has got no instructions. It appears that by the efflux of time  the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, if any cause of action survives even  today, it will be open to the petitioner to move an application for recall of this order.

Dt. 25.8.2006.

Rkb.23251/93    


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.