Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SANJEEV KUMAR versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sanjeev Kumar v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 17703 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 14564 (28 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Umesh   indicted in case crime No. 479  of 2000 under sections 379 and 411  I.P.C. P.S. Uttar  District Firozabad.

Heard Shri S.N. Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant was in jail in case no. 26 of 2001 under sections 395, 397 and 412 I.P.C. P.S. Etamadpur. The learned counsel submitted that fictitious recovery of stolen motorcycle has been made from the possession of the applicant. The learned counsel urged that applicant was arrested in compliance  of non-bailable warrant.

The learned A.G.A. argued that recovery of stolen motorcycle was made at the pointing out of the applicant.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The recovery of stolen motorcycle is said to have been made in the month January 2001. The applicant was in jail on 28.1..2001 in case No. 26 of 2001 under sections 395, 397 and 412 I.P.C. The applicant was arrested in the present case in the month of July 2006.In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Umesh   indicted in case crime No. 479  of 2000 under sections 379 and 411  I.P.C. P.S. Uttar  District Firozabad , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/17703/06

28.8.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.