High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Danish v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4536 of 2006  RD-AH 14633 (29 August 2006)
Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.
Hon'ble Barkat Ali Zaidi, J.
We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State. We have gone through the judgment under appeal.
Office is directed to summon the trial court record within a period of six weeks.
It is contended that the entire case of the prosecution rests on circumstantial evidence and there is evidence of last seen only. The appellant was on bail during trial and did not misuse the liberty of bail. He has also urged that co-accused Smt. Shahana and Rubi were bailed out by this Court on 4.8.2006.
After having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties, all facts and circumstances of the case, we find it appropriate to enlarge the appellant on bail during pendency of appeal.
Let the appellant-Danish be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Ghaziabad in S.T. No. 1105 of 2001 State Vs. Shahana and others.
The appellant is allowed one-month time from today to deposit the entire amount of fine in the court below.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.