Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

GAJENDRA @ BICHCHU versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Gajendra @ Bichchu v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4757 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 14639 (29 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.

Hon'ble Barkat Ali Zaidi, J.

Sri Diwakar Singh and Sri K.K. Mishra, Advocates have filed their parcha today on behalf of the complainant, the same is taken on record.

We have heard learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Diwakar Singh and Sri K.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.G.A. for the State. We have gone through the judgment under appeal.

Admit.

Connect this appeal with Criminal Appeals No. 4571 of 2006 and 4758 of 2006.

Office is directed to summon the trial court record within a period of six weeks.

It is contended that co-accused Bheekam, Veer Singh and Hari Om were bailed out by this Court on 21.8.2006. There was long standing enmity between the parties. Moreover, two prosecution witnesses, namely, Anil and Hori Lal did not support the prosecution story.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant is entitled to be released on bail during pendency of appeal.

Let the appellant-Gajendra @ Bichchu be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bijnor in S.T. No. 257 of 1998 State Vs. Gajendra @ Bichchu.

If the appellant deposits a sum of Rs.5,000/- as fine in the court below within a period of six weeks from today, the recovery of remaining amount of fine shall remain stayed.

29.8.2006

OP/4757/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.