High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Amir Ahmad v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4933 of 2006  RD-AH 14745 (30 August 2006)
Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.
Hon'ble Barkat Ali Zaidi, J.
We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the judgment in question.
Connect this appeal with Criminal Appeals no. 4706 of 2006 and 4658 of 2006.
Office is directed to summon the trial court record within a period of six weeks.
It is contended that co-accused Afjal and Babar have already been bailed out by this Court. The appellant has been assigned the role of catching hold the deceased (Tahir) and Shaukat had set fire. The appellant was on bail during trial and did not misuse the liberty of bail.
Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties, we find it appropriate to enlarge the appellant on bail during pendency of appeal.
Let the appellant-Amir Ahmad be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Rampur in S.T. No. 437 of 1997 State Vs. Rabia Begum and others.
If the appellant deposits a sum of Rs.3000/- as fine within one-month from today in the court below, the recovery of the remaining amount of fine shall remain stayed.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.